Showing bunch of numbers and stats about a few schools doesn't give enough of an idea as to how much money schools really make. The schools shown were some of the top schools in the nation and the wealthiest as well. This skews our idea of how much schools make and of their ability to pay athletes if needed. I think that if a podcast were used to present the information and to ask the main question, we could get a much better understanding of the issue. You could get members of the administration, NCAA executives, students, and student-athletes to come together in a similar setting to talk about the issue. This would give people a way to hear from all sides of the argument, all while forming their own opinion without physically seeing any glaring numbers or even the people talking. By simply listening, all physical traits and information is gone and very little bias is involved. Your impressions and opinions will all be formed solely by what they say. Overall, I though the research you had was good and very pertinent, so I would simply change the medium through which you deliver the information and pose the argument.
You should discuss the idea of athletes getting paid and their advantages through a sort of podcast or discussion style environment. I love to talk about sports and athletes so I found every bit of the presentation compelling and intriguing. However, I think that the style used to present the information in the first place was not ideal.
Showing bunch of numbers and stats about a few schools doesn't give enough of an idea as to how much money schools really make. The schools shown were some of the top schools in the nation and the wealthiest as well. This skews our idea of how much schools make and of their ability to pay athletes if needed. I think that if a podcast were used to present the information and to ask the main question, we could get a much better understanding of the issue. You could get members of the administration, NCAA executives, students, and student-athletes to come together in a similar setting to talk about the issue. This would give people a way to hear from all sides of the argument, all while forming their own opinion without physically seeing any glaring numbers or even the people talking. By simply listening, all physical traits and information is gone and very little bias is involved. Your impressions and opinions will all be formed solely by what they say. Overall, I though the research you had was good and very pertinent, so I would simply change the medium through which you deliver the information and pose the argument.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
April 2016
Categories
All
|