2. How and when did this cycle of money solely contributing to these teams begin? Can this cycle ever end? will it only get worse?
3.Are there any alternatives to allow other athletic teams, programs, and academics to be fairly contributed with money?
This was a very interesting lecture and discussion, and definitely a very conflicting topic as both sides have very convincing evidence. On one side you see that almost all the money is being contributed to one athletic team rather than being distributed to other organizations, clubs, and academics. However, on the other side, you see that most of the school's revenue and incoming class are dependent on that teams success. I think that we should see more funding going to other athletics, programs, and most importantly to academics. However, I believe that most of the revenue made by that athletic teams should go back to funding for their team, since that is where most of the school's success comes from.